Skip to main content

Regulation Update

AIS 230 and the Security of EV Charging Interfaces

Electrification extends the vehicle attack surface past the vehicle. Charging communication is a genuine trust boundary, and it is now inside regulatory scope.

Article details

Category
Regulation Update
Published
Reading time
7 min read
Author
AutoSec Academy · Practitioner Editorial Team

A charging session is a communication session. The vehicle and the supply equipment negotiate parameters, exchange identifiers and, in some deployments, authorise payment. Each of those is an interface an attacker can reach without touching the vehicle’s interior.

Why charging deserves its own analysis

  • The counterparty is infrastructure you do not own and cannot patch
  • Physical access to public charging equipment is trivially available to an attacker
  • Charging communication reaches systems with real energy-domain consequences
  • Identity and billing data may traverse the same interface

Fitting charging into your CSMS

Charging interfaces belong in the same item definitions, TARAs and monitoring processes as the rest of the vehicle. Organisations that treat charging as an energy-team concern rather than a cybersecurity item end up with an unassessed interface at type approval.

Scope and applicability are defined through the Indian regulatory process and continue to evolve alongside charging infrastructure standards. Verify current requirements directly.

Back to the Knowledge Center

Stay current

Get the Next One in Your Inbox

Regulatory updates and lab research, sent when there is something worth saying.

Threat intelligence, straight to your inbox

Regulatory updates, lab research and new program announcements. No noise.

What should we send you?

Go Deeper Than an Article

The programs behind this analysis put you on real ECU hardware, with practitioners who do this work for a living.